Visit Miss Dev's column >>

MISS DEV

The Beer Sherpa
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 61; Links Seeded: 288
Member Since: 1/2006Last Seen: 8/11/2009

The Democratic Hypocrisy, or A Person's A Person

This guy.

advertisement

The modern Democratic party is built on the ideals of equality and unity. Bringing people together no matter who they are. With Barack Obama running for president, this theme is more important and in the spotlight than ever. So why aren't the Democrats practicing what they preach at the DNC?
There has been an interesting disconnect between the Democratic message and the Democratic practice here at the DNC in Denver. From the arbitrary division of passes into the convention to the attitudes of certain people participating in the convention, it seems to be contrary to the message the Dems are attempting to convey.

In her speech on Tuesday night, Hillary Clinton said of Barack Obama: "He knows government must be about 'we the people' not 'we the favored few.'" And in Joe Biden's speech on Wednesday, he said that his mother always said, "Everyone is equal and everyone is equal to you." Then why, in important political processes, are some people placed above others? It was a step in the direction of true unity and equality to open up the final night of the convention to the public, but what about more intimate affairs? Wouldn't the people who are in Denver for the DNC love more question-and-answer sessions with the speakers? More open access to people and events that interest them?

But it goes beyond access... it's also about attitude. Does the person standing next to you in the Pepsi Center line thinking you look like a dirty hippie, or just another conventioneer excited to be experiencing this monumental event? Should a someone who wants to participate in "the political process" have to look a certain way? Dress a certain way? What if you can't afford a pantsuit and hat?

Ay, there's the rub...

At some point along the way, we decided that we are different from someone else. Maybe it's because of skin color. Or language. Or gender. Or age. Or sexuality. But in the Democratic Party, where the previous items are viewed as issues we have fought, and won, what divides us is what unites the Republicans: money. Money, power, and now, celebrity.

At the Ritz-Carlton downtown, one DNC visitor was overheard saying, "I don't have to put up with this! I have money!" in response to a question from the concierge. Two men in a rented SUV with "press" tags up in all of the windows nearly hit my car when they came zooming through an alley, not bothering to yield to traffic already in the street.

While waiting in line to get into the Pepsi Center compound on Tuesday night, a woman and man, dressed more for a polo match at the country club then, well, anything else, pushed ahead of me in the line. I noticed that they wore hall passes that said "honored guest" on them and that they also bore Vail Resorts credentials. As they attempted to squeeze further up in line, I heard the woman say, "I can't believe there's only one line and that we are expected to stand here with these people." First, I wanted to kick them. Then to scream. Then to mess up the woman's perfectly smooth, white hair. I did none of these things. Instead, I just stood and stewed.

When I was finally able to see the entrance of the security tent, I also spotted a friend of mine hiking towards the back of the line. I waved her and her coworker to come over. We hugged and hadn't even said "hello" when a security guard told them they needed to go to the back of the line. In the spirit of comprehensive honesty, I have to admit that I was going to allow them to cut, but they left to go to the back without argument. Barely a minute later, and under the watchful gaze of the same security officer, a young woman joined her friends in line. He didn't say a word. I saw that she was wearing a coveted green, or floor, pass. I was irritated. But not nearly as upset as when we were finally funneling into the tent, and another floor pass-holder was admitted in front of us, absolutely no questions asked.

Everyone is more important than someone else.

Who gets what passes? More important, who determines who it is that gets a certain pass? Why are some people "special" guests while others are "honored" guests? And what does that even mean?

The distinction is arbitrary, at best. I saw "special" guests sitting in better seats than "honored" guests and vis versa. One of the other press people at the Pepsi Center Tuesday night said she thought that "honored" guests gave money, whereas "special" guests were people who worked on the campaign or convention. That seemed to jive with what I was witnessing.

It's great that the Democratic Party, or at least Barack Obama, wants to unite America - Democrats and Republicans. But shouldn't they concentrate on their own party, first?

There is a film festival in town called the Impact Film Festival, which highlights films with themes of social awareness (and films I'd rather like to see), requires that one not only have a pass to get into the DNC, but also have a Starz Green Room pass. So, if you're not one of the privileged few who was able to get credentials, you will have to hope the films are released on DVD, which is unlikely unless they are picked up by a distributor.

We attended a party Tuesday night. It was in the Mile High Station, below Mile High Stadium. We hung out, relaxed, and enjoyed just taking a break from the political chaos outside. Even here, however, there was elitism. There was general entry and there was VIP. And when the performer of the evening, Nellie, arrived, those who were trying to leave were cordoned inside as he made his leisurely way from the limo, as if we were going to jump him or something if we were allowed out as he came in. While not necessarily a DNC event, it demonstrates the attitude of some who call themselves Democrats.

What these Democrats who make themselves feel important by spending money and gaining access to areas that the "general public" are forbidden from is that, on election day, one vote is no better than another. They may not like the idea that they are on "those people's" (meaning all of us) level, it's a fact that they'll have to deal with; they're human, just like everyone else.

"If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?" - Shylock, The Merchant of Venice William Shakespeare.

Or, in simpler terms:

"A person's a person, no matter how small." - Horton Hears a Who, Dr Seuss.

The "magic" Democrat who has truly leveled the playing field? President Bill Clinton. The man treated and treats everyone as his equal. When he is speaking to you, you are the only person in the world. When a group of 100 high school students requested an audience with him in 1999, not only did he entertain them, he told his aides to move his most important appointment to the morning. The students met with him around 10am. The Israeli Prime Minister had to wait until 2pm. That is the kind of man that he is.

So why doesn't his party, the party that he represented for eight years, follow suit?

That brings me to the ultimate irony. The ultimate revenge for those of us who bleed and laugh and die just like those who dress better as they do it. Who has the best job at the DNC? Who can get consistantly closest to the politicians, the celebrities, and still wear comfortable clothes doing it? I can tell you, it's not the head of the DNCC, nor is it the multitude of assistants and press that are constantly attached to the politician's sides. It is the cord holder for the stage videographer. His only job is to make sure that the camera cord does not get tangled or tripped on, and he spends the entire convention feet from the speakers. So, despite the elitists in their fancy clothes and celebrities in their tinted-window cars, it is not the guy with his finger on "the button", but the guy who holds the camera cord who I am really jealous of.

  • 35 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.6
4.7
1.2
{"commentId":2616942,"authorDomain":"jade-log"}

Wouldn't the people who are in Denver for the DNC love more question-and-answer sessions with the speakers? More open access to people and events that interest them?

And more of equality. It's depressing that some are more equal than others. Not to worry on voting day they can dress to kill and their vote will count the same as yours and mine. It made me sad to read. I thought back to that weird disco 54. Those with the bodies went to the front of the line. They, in the end though, were just red meat for the beast.

{"commentId":2616942,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"jade-log"}
  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:08 AM EDT
{"commentId":10477985,"authorDomain":"stevespersonal"}

And in politics (not just Democrats...but they are more hypocritical), it's whomever they think they can sell as the underdog that ends up at the front of the line. Then they sell them for sympathy, sell them for looking like the "knight" coming to the rescue, and in the end, just sell them for power and money. "The front of the line" to politicians mean they give "special privilege" to this/these groups at the expense of the rest of us "red meat" chums that are there to feed the beast, the beast in Washington.

But politicians are a bit more subtle than Studio 54...they make the people at the back of the line feel like they need to bring these people in front of them to right a wrong. Oh, it's a great system...a great system indeed. Especially if you are a special interest group who can gain support for more power and more money. Take a picture with a baby and a puppy!

{"commentId":10477985,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"stevespersonal"}
    #1.1 - Wed Nov 4, 2009 4:22 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":2617765,"authorDomain":"jimmbo70"}

    Put very well into perspective that the Democrats are just the same as everyone else EXCEPT for their "ideal". First to preach about sharing your money and higher taxes, last to give their own. Sorry if I am putting a bit of a damper on your story, I am just tired of everyone telling me the the GOP is the "elitist" crowd when the only difference is the GOP gets more publicity on it just because the press is a majority of left wing, self entitled, liberals.

    {"commentId":2617765,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"jimmbo70"}
    • 8 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:12 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2618816,"authorDomain":"johnogrady56"}

    I think you both; formersgt & jade log completely miss the point. The current administration has caused terrible damage to this great country. These characters have to just go away. Bush, Chaney and the rest of that rabble should lead the parade out of the White House

    {"commentId":2618816,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"johnogrady56"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:35 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2626735,"authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}

    Yeah, that's definitely true.

    I mean, hopefully, it can't get any worse.

    {"commentId":2626735,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}
      #3.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:51 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":2619127,"authorDomain":"juno"}

      Miss Dev: Thank you for your insightful article.

      {"commentId":2619127,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"juno"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:03 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2619399,"authorDomain":"rents4u"}

      I cannot believe you are questioning what the demo are preaching.....IT IS POLITICS AS USUAL....to say whatever you need to say in order to get to the Presidency!

      {"commentId":2619399,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"rents4u"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#5 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2620024,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

      So I shouldn't question the status quo? Or I shouldn't question that the Dems are saying they are starting a new brand of politics while, behind closed doors, just practicing the same old ways?

      {"commentId":2620024,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
      • 5 votes
      #5.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:25 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2625992,"authorDomain":"rougeindependent"}

      You should question EVERYTHING especially the corruption in Washington but like FORMER SGT said "Put very well into perspective that the Democrats are just the same as everyone else EXCEPT for their "ideal". First to preach about sharing your money and higher taxes, last to give their own. Sorry if I am putting a bit of a damper on your story, I am just tired of everyone telling me the the GOP is the "elitist" crowd when the only difference is the GOP gets more publicity on it just because the press is a majority of left wing, self entitled, liberals".

      I couldn't have said better myself. That's the truth. GOP AND DEMS are 2 in the same and that is CORRUPTED.

      Yours Truly,
      Indendent Compassionate Conservative

      {"commentId":2625992,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"rougeindependent"}
        #5.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
        {"commentId":2683248,"authorDomain":"bev-votta"}

        I feel your pain...we should all be allowed to share our points of view and be given the same respect in having a decent opinion. You keep sharing your experiences, voice, and opinions. There will always be someone interested in reading and sharing your opinions.

        God forbid if our words and thoughts cease to occur or are censored!

        {"commentId":2683248,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"bev-votta"}
        • 1 vote
        #5.3 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2619959,"authorDomain":"JessWondering"}

        Acting anti-democratically---the party that voided the votes of millions of individual voters because those lawless, reprobate voters actually voted on a day other than the one the Party told them to vote on ?

        Putting up appearances that are not consistent with reality---the party that insisted some voters matter most (Iowa and New Hampshire) and enforced that policy by disenfranchising other (many more) voters?

        Being a fraud--the party that told some voters they couldn't matter, then told them they didn't count and finally told them they could count but only after they no longer mattered?

        The "Democratic Party" ain't democratic. It's a collection of professional office seekers and gormless hobbyists whose goal is self-advancement rather pursuing any value as fundamental as democracy.

        {"commentId":2619959,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"JessWondering"}
        • 4 votes
        Reply#6 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2623410,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

        I'm still trying to get over the fact that someone actually thinks Bill Clinton treats everyone as an equal. Yes, he puts on a good show of it but the real equalizer is $$$s even if the $$$s in question are being delivered by an agent of a foreign power.

        {"commentId":2623410,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
        • 2 votes
        #6.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
        {"commentId":2645056,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

        Having met President Clinton on multiple occasions, I can tell you that, at least on an individual level, he treats everyone as his equal. It's a unique thing amongst politicians. In fact, he's the only politician I've met whose treated me, and those around me, as their equal.

        {"commentId":2645056,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
        • 2 votes
        #6.2 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:40 PM EDT
        {"commentId":10478150,"authorDomain":"stevespersonal"}

        I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat, so please don't read any partisan into this funny reply that I HAD to post based on the current events of the time...

        "Well Miss Dev, you might have had something he wanted."

        {"commentId":10478150,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"stevespersonal"}
          #6.3 - Wed Nov 4, 2009 4:29 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":2619960,"authorDomain":"ember"}

          The reason this matters is because when it comes to the presidency, the direction being taken affects not only a career, but an entire country - and beyond that internationally to the level of global impact. Disparity is the greatest threat to our way of life in the distant future, but it's roots are taking hold now. Hipocracy only perpetuates and avoids the issue, and it's not limted to this one party, it's society wide. That being said, I believe you are absolutely right on target here. I disagree with the idea that this is "Politics as Usual," because if that's what is "usual" then that is what should change. Afterall, consessions may get you where you want to be, but they rarely take you where you want to go.

          {"commentId":2619960,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"ember"}
            Reply#7 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
            {"commentId":2620021,"authorDomain":"ember"}

            The reason this matters is because when it comes to the presidency, the direction being taken affects not only a career, but an entire country - and beyond that internationally to the level of global impact. Disparity is the greatest threat to our way of life in the distant future, but it's roots are taking hold now. Hipocracy only perpetuates and avoids the issue, and it's not limted to this one party, it's society wide. That being said, I believe you are absolutely right on target here. I disagree with the idea that this is "Politics as Usual," because if that's what is "usual" then that is what should change. Afterall, consessions may get you where you want to be, but they rarely take you where you want to go.

            {"commentId":2620021,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"ember"}
              Reply#8 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:25 AM EDT
              {"commentId":2620252,"authorDomain":"lele"}

              You have a really interesting perspective. I can completely see what you mean - the message being preached through the big speeches/TV coverage is that we are all equal etc (Joe Biden last night) but in reality, we live in a world and society where there will always be 'haves' and 'have nots'. For the Democrats to seemingly exude the poison from within is not too surprising but is still pretty sad.

              Maybe their message really is saying that because of the 'American Dream' we believe in the possibility that maybe someday we all can reach the same level, but until you get there, no floor passes for you.

              {"commentId":2620252,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"lele"}
              • 4 votes
              Reply#9 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
              {"commentId":2620461,"authorDomain":"DoubtinThomas"}
              DoubtinThomasDeleted
              {"commentId":2621509,"authorDomain":"howard521"}

              Obama supporters keep chanting the mantra that says "Barack Obama is the candidate who can unite our country" ... but, Obama couldn't even unite his own party ... even after winning the nomination. And, in reality, McCain has the history of working across the aisle in congress.
              Obama has brainwashed his followers into making decisions based on 'belief', rather than reason ... this relieves his followers from having to deal with facts
              ... this relieves his followers from having to think all they have to do is believe Barack.
              This is what Obama learned in Jeremiah Wright's church ... you can lead people through the power of BLIND faith. Even his campaign solgan is based on belief, not common sense, logic, or reason. Obama's even got his followers publicly denouncing the importance of experience ... as if to say that experience is the reason Bush performed poorly ... when the real reason Obama and his followers denounce experience, is because Obama doesn't have any. Keep America Strong ... Elect Senator John McCain in November !!!

              {"commentId":2621509,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"howard521"}
              • 2 votes
              Reply#11 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
              {"commentId":2672820,"authorDomain":"elsholland"}

              McCain was my man in 2000, but no way in 2008.!

              {"commentId":2672820,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"elsholland"}
                #11.1 - Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":2621601,"authorDomain":"mdowmdowusa"}

                Nice article. I too get fed up with the hypocrisy of the Democrat party. It is shear arrogance to think that you can tell people what to do with their homes, their cars, their lives, but it doesn't apply to you. I can't stand the fact that celebrities are shown on television at these conventions and given airtime. WHO CARES? I could care less if Oprah or Chevy Chase or some other loser celebrity is at the convention. If anything, that gives me more reason to NOT vote for that candidate.

                {"commentId":2621601,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"mdowmdowusa"}
                • 4 votes
                Reply#12 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2621905,"authorDomain":"casadepalmer92"}

                what we need in this country is a serious candidate (Independent Party) that has no ties to special interest groups (Democrats) or big business (Republicans)

                Neither party that we have represents what I believe this country needs in leadership....talk about dis in franchised voter!!

                {"commentId":2621905,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"casadepalmer92"}
                • 1 vote
                Reply#13 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2622099,"authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}

                I feel the same way... its usually a choice between the lesser of two evils... and that division is really hard to see.

                {"commentId":2622099,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}
                • 3 votes
                #13.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2645429,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

                We need serious election reform (i.e. getting rid of the electoral college and having a run-off voting process) before we can ever expect to escape the two party system that is such a detriment to our country.

                {"commentId":2645429,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                  #13.2 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2672853,"authorDomain":"elsholland"}

                  You will have to change your constitution. We need room for more than 2 parties. Look at some of the European countries. Some of them have 5 parties. As long as our country does not allow more parties we will always be stuck with the D's and the R's.

                  Bob Barr (I) does not have a chance nor does Nader and anyone else.. and that's what's wrong with American politics.

                  {"commentId":2672853,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"elsholland"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #13.3 - Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2673644,"authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}

                  I would have to agree with what both casadepalmer92 and Miss Dev stated regarding 3rd parties.

                  However, I think that this is far easier said than done because a lot of intrests would be threatened by this and would resist this tooth and nail and I just don't see it happening anytime soon.

                  {"commentId":2673644,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #13.4 - Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:03 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2622076,"authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}

                  I live north of Denver... and I really wish I could go south for the convention... but the idea of putting up with everyone in order to see what they stage for people to see seems ludicrous.

                  Id be jealous of the cord holder too...

                  I really find that everyone is only interested in "me" so your observation doesnt surprise me about the convention. You learn early on its not what you know but who... not who you know but what you have... and not what you have but how much of it you can wield. Its like a progressive knowledge in life...

                  Sad thing is, that it crosses cultures, races and creeds... the human dilemma is wanting to be on top of the heap and putting yourself in front of others but needing those same others in order to do so.

                  What I wouldnt give for a government full of people who did not force their own views into government, but willingly listened to both (all) sides and thought (truly thought) about a solution for solution sake and not their own agenda. Neither side can offer me that.

                  {"commentId":2622076,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}
                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#14 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2622549,"authorDomain":"jerimy"}

                  Thanks for giving us a behind the scenes view. I'm sorry, you didn't enjoy your time at the convention because you came to realize that money can make a person more important. Welcome to the real word. Please quit confusing equal (a value judgement) with sameness (an absence of differences). Your dollars and votes are just as good as anyone's in the Democratic Party even with our differences (unlike the other party), it's just some of them have more dollars which means they bring more value to the party and therefore are treated better than others. In the end though, the real difference is not in how you're treated by others (which is were your jealousy comes from) but how you treat others.

                  {"commentId":2622549,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"jerimy"}
                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#15 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2645227,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

                  Thank you for your comment, but I don't recall saying that I didn't enjoy my time at the DNC; I was simply making the observation about my experiences. I'm also not sure where I confused equal and sameness? I am aware that my vote and my money is just as good as anyone elses, thus the reason that the title includes "a person's a person" - because I know what my worth is, but the behavior I witnessed may discourage other people from participating.

                  I wasn't genuinely jealous of the cord holder - what I was trying to show was that it is often those who are overlooked who either (A) are in the "best position or (B) have the most influence (just think if he pulled that cord out...)

                  Essentially, the goal of this article (which I may have missed the mark on) was that hypocrisy is everywhere - especially in places where you least think to find it.

                  {"commentId":2645227,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #15.1 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:46 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2624833,"authorDomain":"lilorphant"}

                  This all sounds like a case of bad manners and poor form. Equality of opportunity, the basis for the Democratic party essentially means the government cannot discriminate. If you make it personal you'll be bitterly dissapointed in life. I go to Disneyworld every year and the people who get fast passes get on first, some people jump the stanchions to get ahead, do everything they can to get ahead.

                  Sometimes people do just that. They do whatever they can to get ahead, cut ahead, run ahead. Should we start passing laws to give citations to people who cut in line? I don't know, it just seems like cutting in line and snobbery has no party line.

                  {"commentId":2624833,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"lilorphant"}
                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#16 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:44 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2645273,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                  it just seems like cutting in line and snobbery has no party line.

                  Which was part of the point I was trying to make. Bad manners, snobbery, just plain discrimination based on arbitrary impressions is everywhere. I just thought it was interesting how the Dems are so ardent about saying that we are all equal and that we should all unite when there are so clearly people in the party who completely disagree.

                  {"commentId":2645273,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #16.1 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2624912,"authorDomain":"DawnInDallas"}

                  Sadly, a thumbs up to your pretty accurate perspective. :-/

                  {"commentId":2624912,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"DawnInDallas"}
                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#17 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:50 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2638367,"authorDomain":"MRZK"}

                  It is not elitism, it is logistic necessity to isolate in that manner (could Biden get to the stage in a timely manner from the middle of the crowd for example)? As for the limo for performers, it's SOP these days. Blame the public.

                  You also can't get elected without the cash these days.

                  {"commentId":2638367,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MRZK"}
                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#18 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2645391,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

                  I agree that restricting access is a logistic necessity. I don't agree with the passes to certain areas being handed out so arbitrarily. One example from last night: I was in section 538, the last row, that is almost as far up and away from the field as you can get in Mile High. The man sitting on my left was the floor manager at the Pepsi Center who had ensured that everything was set up properly, supervised maintenance on the space each night, and generally orchestrated the whole thing, and I feel he deserved a seat that wasn't at the very top of the stadium, especially when people who had simply donated money where leagues below us. There's a disconnect there.

                  {"commentId":2645391,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #18.1 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2644839,"authorDomain":"cellisor"}

                  Like Ralph said, the difference between Democrats and Republicans is how fast their knees hit the floor when corporate money walks through the door. We know that they have us. We better vote for one or the other or our votes are wasted. If given the choice, I'll vote Democrat every time because my life is made better by it. Often I wish there was a better choice.

                  {"commentId":2644839,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"cellisor"}
                    Reply#19 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":2645618,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

                    I just wanted to highlight two things I experienced yesterday.

                    In the morning I went to the Women's Caucus at the Convention Center. The ballroom sat around 1000 people, so it was much more intimate than any of the other venues I'd yet been in. I got to see some amazing congresswomen speak to great reception. Michelle Obama was the keynote speaker, and it was so fun to see her up close and in a less "formal" setting. But my favorite moment of the caucus was when Howard Dean came in, after most of the attendees had left, and gave a speech about the direction of the party. He interacted with the audience somewhat and just seemed more accessible than other politicians had been throughout the week.

                    The other observation I made was at Mile High Stadium. When I was hiking to the top of the stadium, I noticed that the elevators were closed. I found out later that they were closed to everyone, including the physically handicapped. Everyone, except the press, that is. I also noticed that the handicap boxes were closed off for "VIP" seating. Since these boxes are larger and have larger bathrooms, I guess they felt it was okay to cordon them off. Since I didn't make it all the way around the stadium, I didn't see if this was all of the handicap boxes, but it was definitely more than I'd ever seen blocked off... which made me wonder if that's even legal.

                    So, there was a leveling of sorts and a discrimination of sorts that I witnessed that has left me wondering...

                    {"commentId":2645618,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#20 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:02 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":2682882,"authorDomain":"bev-votta"}

                    Miss Dev...I envy you, being able to get up close and personal in any one of these events. I would have loved a job that would have given me the opportunity to get up close and personal whether they be of Dem or Rep influence. However, the crowds...ugh...It must be like waiting in line to see Miley Cyrus or the Pope. There will always be those that edge their way through a crowd, given their 'special passes'. Some of those must have worked their butts off for their party's affiliation and deserved the right to step forward and get a better seat. I know I would have expected as such and why not.

                    I fight political injustices on a regular basis; writing letters and phoning my congressman and on a daily basis put my two cents to work in forums such as these from my desk top or from Starbucks on my laptop and must say I never have to wait in line or vye for a fabulous seat. I never have a bad seat attending events or do I have to succumb to have negative or feel less worthy trying to get through a crowd. The only thing I miss in crowds is the excitement of the hub-bub and having entertaining mini conversations with people I don't know and probably will never run into again. Being trapped in crowds, whether big or small, you can always expect some lucky souls will always have a special place at the table...if you know what I mean.

                    You know, as I have gotten older and a bit wiser, I really don't miss the craziness in crowds. As far as I am concerned the crowd really isn't different whether you're waiting in line to see a politician or the hottest thing in music...you'll always get those that are vying for front seats and back stage passes. I suppose going to the front line means they are either the headliners biggest fan or they have worked their way up to that spot. I suppose it's like going to grandpa's and grandma's house for dinner on Sunday. We always had to sit at the kids table until you were old enough to earn a spot at the grown ups table. Hence, the best seat in the house in fighting issues can be right from the most comfortable seat in my home; typing away on my pc voicing my concerns on any issue especially in a forum such as this one.

                    {"commentId":2682882,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"bev-votta"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #20.1 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":2648788,"authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}

                    One of my all-time fave Viners. Any girl who knows her ale from her pils is high up my list. Congrats Miss Dev!

                    {"commentId":2648788,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}
                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#21 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:45 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":2657956,"authorDomain":"nitewingsg1"}
                    "A person's a person, no matter how small." - Horton Hears a Who, Dr Seuss.

                    A statement that doesn't fit into American Political Parties or for that matter in everyday life for many. We are who we are. Money, politics, religion all seem to bring out the worst in us more often than the best. It's a shame a simple statement like this is not a daily reminder of who we are. My children grew up watching Mister Rogers Neighborhood, as a adult it is still a program worth watching. The value one shows to another should be equal.

                    I enjoy your writing Miss Dev! You write what you see.

                    {"commentId":2657956,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"nitewingsg1"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#22 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":2894576,"authorDomain":"dodacrazy"}

                    Good evening room.A sensible ,polite,person does not assume to be better or wiser or richer than his neighbor.He does not boast of his rank,or his birth,or his country,and look down upon others because they have not been born to like privileges with himself.He does not brag of his achievements or of his calling,or'talk shop'whenever he opens his mouth. On the contrary,in all that he says or does he will be modest,unpretentious,unassuming exhibiting his true char actor in preforming rather than in boasting in doing rather than in talking. Want of respect for the feelings of others usually originates in selfishness,and issues in hardness and repulsiveness of manner.It may not proceed from malignity so much as from want of sympathy and want of delicacy-a want of that perception of,and attention to,those little and apparently trifling things by which pleasure is given or pain occasioned to others.Indeed,it may be said that in self-sacrificuingness,so to speak,in the ordinary intercourse of life,mainly consists the difference between being well and ill bred. Men succeed in life quite as much by their temper as by their talents

                    {"commentId":2894576,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"dodacrazy"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#23 - Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:31 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":2900091,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

                    "It is not our abilities that show what we truly are. It is our choices." - Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

                    {"commentId":2900091,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
                      #23.1 - Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":7722553,"authorDomain":"kidden2008000"}
                      kidden2008000Deleted
                      {"commentId":9807424,"authorDomain":"barbaraenglish9"}

                      Miss Dev; the article you wrote sounds very pompous and full of envy. Equality does not mean that everyone is the same or has the same privileges. It just means that you are no better than I am even if you do have more money or are better looking or whatever. At least half the people in America are Democrats and for you to call us all hypocrits just because you don't understand our point of view, is just going over the line. You quote some instances of rudeness without acknowledging that republicans can be rude,also. I could go on and on pointing out the flaws in your logic but I'm tired of typing.

                      {"commentId":9807424,"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226","authorDomain":"barbaraenglish9"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#25 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 12:19 AM EDT
                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"341834","isPrivate":false}
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      {"threadId":"341834","contentId":"1793226"}
                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking